The new year is coming. 2024 is over and I spent a chunk of it reading Robert Sapolsky's book Determined in which he argues convincingly that there is no such thing as free will. Yes, but... you may have noticed that I am triggered by claims of absolute truth.
Previously I proposed that Robert was using equivocation fallacy or a conflation of paradigms to have some fun with us and sell a book. Anyway, I fell for it, which is proof that Robert may be onto something. If I had free will, I could have read another Agatha Raisin mystery instead. Look what happened.
So Robert might be right; but just in case, here is one last whack at this straw man to finish off 2024.
This time round, my objection is epistemological. There, that's my big word for this note, proof that I know what I'm talking about. (Just kidding. I'm not sure, as usual.) Epistemology is knowledge about knowledge. In my opinion, knowledge is information (the way things are, objective facts, science) plus affect (what the mind does with information, subjective emotions, values, ideas, opinions, beliefs, poetry).Now that is a confusing suggestion. To make sense of it, I propose that objectively we are sort-of determined and subjectively we are sort-of free, but things work better when our choices have both objective and subjective input, full-featured knowledge.
The sort-of modifier acknowledges that the objective and subjective perspectives are interdependent. Subjective consciousness is an emergent reality determined by its evolution, developmental history, circumstances. Murmurings of approval from Sapolsky. Objective determinism is system of thought emerging from subjective consciousness where the thinker decides what information gets included, what metaphor makes sense of it, what value to place on competing theories. Do I hear muttering?
Thinking about thinking is like two mirrors facing, an infinite recursion of the subjective reflecting the objective reflecting the subjective.... So each emerges from the other and they converge as knowledge.
New thought: knowledge, objective and subjective, is the foundation of free will.*
Thinking objectively about the human situation, we sapiens would do better if we knew how to manage circumstances to help people (including ourselves) make better choices. That would be a good application of determinism. It would make us better parents, teachers, psychologists, criminals, police, judges, legislators. It would make us better people.
But when it comes down to actually making a choice, being too objective could make things worse. If it's all predetermined and beyond our control, if we don't have a choice, we won't waste much time or effort on choosing. And if there's trouble, rather than take responsibility we will blame it on Sapolsky; I mean Robert, not the other one. (Just kidding. There's only one Sapolsky, and he says you don't get a choice.)
But I object. The subjective belief that one has a choice is the motive and permission to choose. If you don't believe in it, you don't get to do it, which makes you a turnip or a mushroom, your choice... Sorry. If you don't believe, you can't choose, so I'll choose for you. You can trust me. I'm good at it. Tinker Bell would live if it depended on me believing. I believe that you are human and can make a choice. Now, make a choice. Turnip, mushroom or human? Come on. You can do it...So believing that you have free will is subjective. Go ahead and choose. However, a choice without good information may generate trouble. You need objective information about circumstances and about yourself. Otherwise you might be elected President by people who don't care about facts; and when they find out what you are up to, you're going to need bodyguards. Way too subjective.
Life is complicated. Making choices is a slow, effortful, recursive process in which the outcomes of current choices inform future choices over and over until we pass it all on to the grandchildren, who are free to choose better if it isn't too late. Then vengeance may be replaced by respect, inclusiveness, empathy, understanding, equity, compassion, fairness, responsibility, restraint, all the good subjective stuff. And they will be better people.
Free will is poetry.
Determinism is science.
Together they work just fine,
although a little slowly sometimes.
That is more than a wish.
Believe that we can make it a happy new year.
Then make it so.
Or not. Your choice.
****************
*Hey Bing: compose a ballad about knowledge as the foundation of free choice.
Bing: Here's a ballad for you:
In a world where shadows dance and play,Where choices come at break of day,
There lies a truth, both bold and bright,
That knowledge lights the path of right.
Upon the hills of thought we climb,
To seek the wisdom of our time,
For in the mind, so vast and grand,
Free will and choice begin to stand.
And keep the soul in chains apart,
'Tis knowledge that shall set it free,
Unveiling worlds we yearn to see.
Of secrets that we strive to know,
For every fact, a hidden key,
Unlocks the door to liberty.
So let us drink from wisdom's well,
And break the bonds of doubt's dark spell,
With every lesson, choice is born,
As night gives way to golden morn.
In every mind, a light doth gleam,
A beacon for our fondest dream,
For knowledge, like a guiding star,
Shall lead us, free, both near and far.
May you find the truth you seek
and let it guide you on your journey!
Thanks, Bing.
Happy New Year.
Next year I will start fresh with Words Gather Here.
You can access any of the previous blogs by opening the profile About Me displayed in any note. And you can use the search bar to find any notes in a blog that contain a particular word or phrase; for example, if you search "climate" you will get notes in this blog containing that word (there are 23 such notes).